I-735 – The initiative to get money out of politics!
Election Results Info for I-735
- We won with 62.8% voter approval.
- We won both Western and Eastern Washington parts of the state.
- We won all 10 Congressional Districts.
- We won 47 of 49 Legislative Districts.
- We won 30 of 39 Counties.
- We lost 6 counties by only 559 votes and one county, Pend Oreille by only 1 vote!
Initiative 735 called on our Congressional Delegation in Washington State to put forth a Constitutional amendment stating corporations are not people, money is not free speech and political contributions should be made public and allowed to be regulated. This amendment would overturn Supreme Court decisions like Citizens United and McCutcheon , which have allowed unlimited amounts of money to be dumped in our elections. An amendment is one of only options we have to correct these court decisions.
After several years of trying to get a resolution or referendum through our state legislature, plus three years working on initiatives with two signature-gathering campaigns and an election campaign, all with very little resources, the voters of Washington passed Initiative 735 with 63% approval calling for a constitutional amendment stating constitutional rights belong only to people, money is not free speech and we have the right to know who’s contributing to elections and be allowed to regulate the flow of money into our elections!
This was no small task and it took years of dedication from countless volunteers, supporters and organizations to get an initiative on the ballot to allow Washington voters to vote on this measure. In 2014, WAmend tried to get an “initiative to people” on the ballot with I-1329, but only collected 175,000 signatures, which wasn’t enough to qualify. After much debate, it was decided to continue and an “initiative to legislature” was filed in 2015 for I-735. Over 1700 volunteers collected more than 293,000 signatures, with an additional 40,000 signatures submitted by Fix Democracy First for I-735’s paid signature gathering effort. All total, more than 333,000 signatures were submitted to qualify for the November 2016 Washington State ballot.
As many know, this was accomplished with very limited funding, resources and staffing. The I-735 campaign spent a lot less money than any other statewide initiative in years. Our committed grassroots volunteer base and leadership team were instrumental and we wouldn’t have succeeded without that kind of dedication. We also had many local and national organizations helping through fundraising, communications to their members, volunteer recruitment, social media, outreach, canvassing, etc.
Direct voter contact was the biggest focus throughout the campaign, and we accomplished this through contact through the signature gathering campaign, tabling, handing out flyers, phone banking, social media, canvassing, attending forums and speaking at events everywhere we could. All our volunteers, leadership team and coalition partners were key in bringing about a successful campaign.
I-735 Full text
Initiative Measure No. 735 concerns a proposed amendment to the federal constitution.
This measure would urge the Washington state congressional delegation to propose a federal constitutional amendment that constitutional rights belong only to individuals, not corporations, and constitutionally-protected free speech excludes the spending of money.
Should this measure be enacted into law? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Ballot Measure Summary
The measure would urge the Washington state congressional delegation to propose a federal constitutional amendment clarifying that constitutional rights belong only to individuals, not corporations; that spending money is not free speech under the First Amendment; that governments are fully empowered to regulate political contributions and expenditures to prevent undue influence; and that political contributions and expenditures must be promptly disclosed to the public. The measure would urge the legislature to ratify such an amendment.
An Act Relating to the influence of corporations and money in our political system; and creating new section.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
New Section. Sec. 1. INTENT
This act declares that the people of Washington State support amending The Constitution of the United States to eliminate the undue influence of concentrated money and political power on elections and governmental policy. The amendment would overturn decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States extending constitutional rights to corporations and other artificial legal entities as well as those decisions equating the spending of money with free speech. It also provides for the regulation and disclosure of political contributions and spending.
New Section. Sec. 2. FINDINGS
- Free and fair elections, as well as honest representation, are essential to self- determination and self-governance as described in The Declaration of Independence and established in The Constitution of the United States.
- The American people have lost faith in the political process because their voices are not heard and their interests are not represented. Thus, an ever smaller percentage of Americans is motivated to vote.
- The U.S. Constitution makes no mention of corporations or other artificial entities; there are no provisions extending rights to such entities. However, through a series of decisions equating a “corporation” with a “person,” the U.S. Supreme Court extended to corporations the constitutional rights and protections intended for people only.
- Unlike human beings, corporations can exist in perpetuity and in many countries at the same time. As a result many large corporations, both foreign and domestic, invest in campaigns to invalidate or bypass regulatory law intended to protect the public. Thus, corporate participation in the political process often conflicts with the public interest.
- Money is property; it is not speech. Nowhere in the U.S. Constitution is money equated with speech. Because advertising is limited and costly, equating the spending of money with free speech gives those with the most money the most speech.
- Whenever special interests, including very wealthy individuals, are able to spend unlimited amounts of money on political speech, candidates and officeholders can be corrupted and intimidated, and the free speech of most citizens is drowned out and denied. Monopolizing public speech neither promotes nor protects free speech.
- Anonymous contributions and spending for political gain promote dishonesty and corruption, preventing voters from assessing the motives of the speaker. The public must be able to hold funders of political speech accountable when their messages prove false or misleading. Full and prompt disclosure of funding sources is essential to an informed electorate, fair elections, and effective governance.
- Article V of the U.S. Constitution empowers the people and the states to use the amendment process to correct egregious decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court that subvert our representative government.
New Section. Sec. 3. POLICY & PROMOTION
The voters of the State of Washington urge immediate action by the current and future Washington State congressional delegations to propose a joint resolution for an amendment to The Constitution of the United States clarifying that:
- The rights listed and acknowledged in The Constitution of the United States are the rights of individual human beings only.
- The judiciary shall not construe the spending of money to be free speech under the First Amendment of The Constitution of the United States. Federal, state, and local governments shall be fully empowered to regulate political contributions and expenditures to ensure that no person or artificial legal entity gains undue influence over government and the political process.
- All political contributions and expenditures shall be disclosed promptly and in a manner accessible to voters prior to elections.
- This act does not limit the people’s rights to freedom of speech, freedom of the press, free exercise of religion, or freedom of association.
New Section. Sec. 4. RECOMMENDATION TO CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION
In accordance with the U.S. Constitution, the voters of the State of Washington urge the Washington state congressional delegation, and the U.S. Congress generally, to include an amendment ratification method which will best ensure that the people are heard and represented during the ratification process.
New Section. Sec. 5. RECOMMENDATION TO STATE LEGISLATURE
The voters of the State of Washington urge our current and future Washington state legislatures to ratify such an amendment when passed by Congress and delivered to the states for ratification.
New Section. Sec. 6. DIRECTION TO SECRETARY OF STATE
The Washington Secretary of State is authorized and directed to immediately deliver copies of this initiative, when enacted, to the following persons:
- the governor of the State of Washington,
- all current members of the Washington State Legislature,
- all current members of the United States Congress, and
- the president of the United States.
New Section. Sec. 7. CONSTRUCTION.
The provisions of this act are to be liberally construed to effectuate the intent, policies, and purposes of this act.
New Section. Sec. 8. SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of this act or its application to any person, entity, or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons, entities, or circumstances is not affected.
New Section. Sec. 9. MISCELLANEOUS.
This act is known and may be cited as the “Government of, by, and for the People Act.”